落日余晖

Final arguments are being made before Australia's vote to create Indigenous Voice_我的网站

A |     CANBERRA, Australia -- Opposing campaigners made their final pitches on Friday over changing the Australia's constitution to acknowledge a place for Indigenous Australians on the eve of the nation's first referendum in a generation.The referendum has the potential to amend Australia’s founding legal document for the first time since 1977. But opinion polls suggest that the amendment will be rejected as more than four-in-five referendums have been in the past.Australians are being asked to alter the constitution to recognize the “First Peoples of Australia” by establishing an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.The committee comprised of and chosen by Indigenous Australians would advise the Parliament and government on issues that affect the nation’s most disadvantaged ethnic minority.Indigenous Australians account for only 3.8% of Australia’s population. But they die on average eight years younger than the wider population, have a suicide rate twice that of the national average and suffer from diseases in the remote Outback that have been eradicated from other wealthy countries.Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, a leading Voice advocate, cited the Israel-Hamas war to underscore why Australians should vote “yes” out of kindness toward the Indigenous population.“This week of all weeks where we see such trauma in the world, there is nothing — no cost — to Australians showing kindness, thinking with their heart as well as their head, when they enter the polling booth tomorrow and vote ‘yes,’” Albanese said.“Kindness costs nothing. Thinking of others costs nothing. This is a time where Australians have that opportunity to show the generosity of spirit that I see in the Australian character where at the worst of times we always see the best of the Australian character,” Albanese added.Opposition leader Peter Dutton, whose conservative party opposes the Voice, said polling showing declining support for the referendum over the past year was evidence Albanese failed to convince voters of the benefits of the Voice. “He’s instinctively won their hearts because Australians do want better outcomes for Indigenous Australians, but he hasn’t won their minds,” Dutton told Australian Broadcasting Corp.Indigenous activist Robbie Thorpe drew attention to Indigenous division over the Voice this week by applying for a High Court injunction to stop the referendum. “The referendum is an attack on Aboriginal Sovereignty,” Thorpe said in a statement on Friday.But the High Court said his writ had been rejected on Thursday on the grounds that it appeared to be an abuse of the court process, frivolous, vexatious or outside the court’s jurisdiction.Thorpe is among so-called progressive “no” campaigners who argue an Indigenous committee with no power of veto over legislation is not a sufficiently radical change.Many progressives argue the constitution should more importantly acknowledge that Indigenous Australians never ceded their land to British colonizers and a treaty was a higher priority than a Voice.Conservative “no” campaigners argue the Voice is too radical and the courts could interpret its powers in unpredictable ways.Some Indigenous people don’t have faith that the Voice’s membership would represent their diverse priorities.“Yes” campaigner Kyam Maher, an Indigenous man who is South Australia state’s attorney general, said the question he was most often asked by thousands of voters was what result Indigenous Australians wanted.“I can say absolutely and overwhelmingly Aboriginal people want their fellow Australians to vote ‘yes’ tomorrow,” Maher said.An opinion poll published this week supported Maher's view that a majority of Indigenous Australians wanted the Voice although that support had eroded since early 2023.Polling suggests the referendum will lose despite Australia’s peak legal, business, faith and sporting groups overwhelmingly supporting the Voice.Anne Twomey, a Sydney University constitutional law expert and a member of the Constitutional Expert Group that advised the government on drafting the referendum question, said she feared that Australian lawmakers might give up trying to change the constitution if the referendum fails.“I think it is a big concern if we end up with a constitution that’s frozen in time that we can’t change,” Twomey said.“In practice around the world, when a constitution becomes frozen and out of date with the world that it operates in, it becomes brittle and when there’s ever any stress on it, it does tend to break,” she added.___Follow AP's Asia-Pacific coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/asia-pacific。    第1名：威少（+30.3）          威少断档第一并不让人意外，反而很符合他的比赛特点。巅峰时期的威少是MVP级别球星，冲击力、转换和篮板能力都极其突出，可他的打法同样建立在大量持球和高风险决策之上，失误、外线投篮选择以及关键时刻的强攻，都会累计大量负面回合。进入生涯后期，随着运动能力下降，过去能够依靠身体完成的进攻越来越难，投射短板也被进一步放大，这导致威少该数据断档高居第一，也变相解释了为何今夏他迟迟找不到合适的下家。         第2名：追梦格林（+17.5）          相比之下，追梦排在第二让人有些意外。勇士王朝时期，他一直是球队防守和组织体系的重要核心，掩护、传球和防守指挥很难完全体现在普通数据里。之所以高居第二是追梦的短板太过明显，随着外线威胁下降，对手越来越敢放空他，当库里被夹击之后，追梦能不能处理好4打3，直接决定勇士进攻质量。再加上部分冒险传球，以及技术犯规和情绪问题，他确实经常制造负面效果，这也是追梦这类体系球员的通病，优势和短板都容易被放大。         3-5名：斯马特、拉塞尔、库兹马          斯马特+13.3排名第三，拉塞尔+13.2第四，库兹马+10.7第五。斯马特防守、拼抢和精神属性突出，可进攻端偶尔会承担超过自身能力的任务，导致数据不够好看，拉塞尔拥有投射和组织能力，高强度比赛下的稳定性却长期受到质疑，库兹马则是在持球和使用率增加之后，效率与决策问题更加明显。三个人风格不同，排名靠前的共同原因都是承担了过大的进攻责任，因而产生了较多失败回合。

B |          第六名：东契奇（+9.8）          东契奇进入前六，是榜单最大的讨论点之一。如果把“失败贡献值”直接理解成拖累球队，那显然解释不通。东契奇长期承担极高球权，大量进攻都由他发起，自然也会积累更多失误、强投和失败回合。一个每场只处理几次球的角色球员，很难产生同样规模的负面数据，因此值得讨论的是，高持球打法本来就有两面性。当东契奇体能下降、比赛陷入连续单打，或者防守投入不足时，这种模式的负面影响也会被同步放大。         7-10名：大球、卢比奥、普尔、特雷-杨          大球和卢比奥同为+8.9，普尔+8.0，特雷-杨+7.2。其中普尔和特雷-杨都属于进攻创造力强、状态波动巨大的后卫，尤其特雷-杨，与东契奇类似，需要承担大量挡拆和持球任务，创造高质量机会的同时，失误和高难度出手也很难避免。

C |

Current article:http://t4cz0kh.foujiongwenruapoumeizhan.buzz/news/20260826_783820.html

Published on:00:00:00